DevHawk for Supply Chain and Logistics | Build AI That Actually Goes Live

Fraction is now DevHawk

Same team, new name, new model. We build with agentic engineering: small senior teams directing fleets of coding agents, which is why the scope that used to need a department now needs a pod.

Read the full story.

Supply chain and logistics

So, you're finally building with AI.

Every manufacturer, distributor and supply chain platform has been told AI will fix the forecast. Far fewer have anything running that a planner or a dispatcher actually opens on a Monday. That gap is the whole job.

Product Management AI agent
Product Management
Engineering AI agent
Engineering
Security AI agent
Security
Code Review AI agent
Code Review
QA Automation AI agent
QA Automation
DevOps AI agent
DevOps
Site Reliability AI agent
Site Reliability

We deploy AI agents to either build custom software for you (20% human, 80% agentic) or fix bottlenecks in your engineering pipeline slowing down the team.

Two Ways to Run Our AI Agents

Your AI agents cover the whole build and keep it running: specs, code, review, QA, infrastructure, maintenance. Choose to have our senior engineers operate the factory, or run it in-house with our setup and support behind you.

We Manage it For You

Get output without running the engineering operation. Bring us your roadmap and we take it from there: we operate the agents, ship the releases, and own everything after launch.

Run the Agents yourself, with our support

The DIY option. We customize the agents, plug them into your existing engineering operation, and you run it.

Tell us what you're trying to build.

Most conversations in this space start in one of these places. Find the row that sounds like your week — that's the conversation we want to have.

  • D-1

    Demand planning

    The forecast lives in a spreadsheet, updates monthly, and gets overridden by whoever argues hardest in the S&OP meeting.

  • I-1

    Inventory and allocation

    Safety stock levels set years ago, so you carry stockouts and dead stock at the same time.

  • P-1

    Procurement and sourcing

    RFQs, quotes and supplier terms sit in email threads, and there's no single price of record.

  • L-1

    Freight and logistics

    Rates, tenders and tracking spread across a dozen carrier portals, and landed cost is known after the fact.

  • W-1

    Warehouse operations

    Labor planned on gut feel, and slotting untouched since the last WMS upgrade.

  • C-1

    Supplier risk

    Supplier documents chased by email, and you hear about a disruption from your customer first.

  • O-1

    Orders and exceptions

    EDI errors worked in a queue by hand, and expedites approved by whoever escalates loudest.

  • T-1

    Product roadmap

    Features your customers keep asking for sit behind an engineering queue you can't hire your way out of.

  • T-2

    Customer integrations

    Every new logo means another ERP, WMS or carrier connector built from scratch by your senior people.

The shaded rows are the ones we hear from software teams; the rest come from operators. Plenty of firms are both. Not on the list? Bring it anyway — the first call is scoping, not selling.

We build on the stack you already run.

No rip and replace. We connect to what your planners and dispatchers already open. If you're the one building the platform, this is the list your customers ask you to integrate with.

  • SAP S/4HANA and IBP ERP and planning
  • Oracle SCM Cloud ERP and planning
  • NetSuite and Dynamics 365 Mid-market ERP
  • Blue Yonder Planning and WMS
  • Manhattan Associates WMS and TMS
  • Kinaxis Supply planning
  • Coupa and Ariba Procurement
  • project44 and FourKites Visibility
  • EDI 850, 855, 856, 810
  • Shopify and Amazon Channel and marketplace
  • Salesforce and HubSpot CRM and quoting
  • Snowflake and Power BI Warehouse and BI

Also: homegrown planning tools, carrier portals with no API, and the spreadsheet the whole forecast actually runs on.

What changed, in plain terms.

The technology stopped being the constraint about eighteen months ago. Ownership is the constraint now.

How it used to work

  • The ERP, the WMS, the carrier portals and the planning spreadsheet each hold a different version of the truth
  • Forecasts rebuilt by hand every cycle, then overridden in the room
  • Exceptions found after the shipment moved, the order shipped or the customer called
  • Connector work quoted in quarters, with each new customer starting from zero
  • Pilots that impress the steering committee and never reach a planner's screen

How it works now

  • One layer reading across your systems without moving your system of record
  • Forecasts and allocation that update as orders, lead times and costs change
  • Exceptions surfaced while there's still time to do something about them
  • Integration work measured against your release cycle, not a procurement cycle
  • Something in the hands of a planning team, not a transformation office

Want the full picture on DevHawk?

How we work, who's on the bench, the industries we build in and everything we've shipped. Start at the top.

Or just book the call.

Thirty minutes with Zahra. Bring a problem from the list above and you'll leave with a scope and an honest read on whether it's worth building.